Send context, not just a pitch.
We respond best when a message identifies the page, the decision at stake, and the evidence we should review.
Good reasons to write
- A factual correctionIdentify the article, statement, and primary or official source that supports the change.
- A useful tool suggestionExplain the task it solves and why it adds something current coverage does not.
- A site issueShare the page, device, and behavior that made the content difficult to use.
- A relevant business inquiryState the organization, proposal, audience fit, and required disclosure clearly.
Our screening logic
Messages with a clear page reference, verifiable correction, practical reader benefit, or well-defined proposal are the easiest to assess.
We generally do not respond to bulk link requests, requests for guaranteed positive coverage, disguised paid placements, unrelated services, or messages that omit the subject entirely.
A tool being available is not, by itself, a reason for coverage. The message should explain the reader problem and the editorial gap.
Corrections, sources, and coverage ideas
Editorial messages are judged on accuracy, relevance, evidence, and reader value. Payment does not buy a conclusion.
Advertising and partnership proposals
Commercial conversations remain separate from editorial decisions and require clear labeling where applicable.
Include the details we need to review it
Do not send passwords, payment information, confidential client material, or private datasets.
What happens next
We review messages for relevance and route them by purpose. Clear corrections and reader-facing site issues receive priority. A useful reply may take several business days; unrelated solicitations may not receive an individual response.
Send only what the inquiry needs
Contact submissions should contain the minimum information required to understand the request. See the Privacy Policy for more information.
A specific page, question, and source make a message actionable.
That context helps us separate a useful correction or proposal from a general solicitation and respond with the appropriate level of review.